The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. While recognizing the credibility of the statement made by the victim G (hereinafter “victim”) of mistake of facts in a very detailed and consistent manner, the lower court acquitted the Defendant and the person subject to the request for attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) on the ground that the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts.

B. The lower court’s dismissal of the request for an attachment order is unreasonable, even if it is found that the Defendant committed two or more sexual crimes and thereby committed the risk of recidivism.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관하여 1) 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2012. 3.경부터 안산시 단원구 E, 304호에서 피고인의 여자친구인 F과 동거하여 왔고, 피해자는 F의 친구로서 2013. 9. 9.부터 직장 문제로 피고인과 F의 허락을 받아 같은 장소에서 함께 거주하였다. 가) 강제추행 피고인은 2013. 9. 중순경 위와 같은 장소에서, TV를 보며 누워있던 피해자를 강제추행할 마음을 먹고 한 손으로 피해자의 양팔을 붙잡아 머리 위로 올려 반항하지 못하게 한 후 피해자의 귀, 목 등을 핥고, 피해자의 옷과 브래지어를 위로 올린 다음 피해자의 가슴을 입으로 핥아 피해자를 강제로 추행하였다.

B) The Defendant committed rape (1) on September 2013, 2013, at around 18:00 on the first day of September 2013, 2013, committed the crime of rape, and around 18:0, at the same place as above, had a single hand failed to resist the victim’s hair by putting the victim’s arms on his/her head, making the victim unable to resist from the victim’s hair, and tried to leave panty and put the victim’s finger into the victim’s sexual organ and inserting the victim’s sexual organ into the victim’s sexual organ. However, on September 19, 2013, the Defendant failed to commit the crime and attempted the crime at around 18:0 on September 10, 2013.