A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:35 on June 13, 2014, the Defendant returned home to the Defendant after confirming that police officers belonging to the Ulsannam Police Station, who received a report at the cost of the former alcohol value, were in full calculated the drinking value, and the Defendant returned home to the Defendant. The Defendant spawned off the above D’s chest on the spath, plicked, and plicked the spath of the said D’s chest on the spath, with the victim’s spath, and the victim’s slope, who was on the back, returned to the horse back to the horse, carried the above E’s arms, bpathing the spath, and knhing the spath of the above E’s face by hand, and bpathing the above E’s face by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted and interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of their duties on the maintenance of order D and E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence of the obstruction of performance of official duties shall be determined as per the disposition, taking into account the following factors: (a) the basic area (6-1-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of a sentence] (the face of a police officer called upon receiving a report), which is not good for committing a crime, such as assaulting the face of a police officer called out upon receiving a report; (b) it is not good for him/her to commit a crime; (c) he/she