All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding a judgment to this court as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The defendant asserts that, as the grounds for appeal by this court, the information of this case is subject to non-disclosure under Article 9 (1) 4 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter "Information Disclosure Act"), since it is difficult to view that the information of this case has an impact on the judgment of facts in the lawsuit if it is disclosed as information on related civil litigation, not only on the defendant's official opinion, but also on the internal opinion of the employees belonging to the defendant, and it is merely an internal opinion, and it is difficult to view that it contributes to the discovery of substantial truth in the lawsuit, and therefore, it constitutes information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9 (1) 4 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter "Information Disclosure Act"), if disclosed as it is the information on the supervision of this case's official opinion, causing external confusion by misunderstanding that the defendant's position is obvious, and it is highly likely to interfere with the fair performance of the supervision in the future.

The above arguments made by the defendant in this court are arguments that do not differ from the contents of the defendant's assertion in the first instance court, or that dispute the grounds for the first instance court cited earlier, and all the evidences presented in the first instance court have been examined.