Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs incurred after the appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On or around September 28, 2010, the Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with A with respect to B cargo vehicles owned by A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is the installation and manager of Gun roads No. 23, located in the illegal scopic scopic scopic 23.
B. At around 05:00 on September 30, 2010, C: (a) driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle and opened a bend road by one-lane 23 Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do Do Do Do Do Do Do do Do Do do Do Do Do do Do Do Do Do do Do Do Do Do
(hereinafter referred to as “instant road location” and the said accident is referred to as “instant accident”). C.
According to the instant accident, until May 30, 2011, the Plaintiff paid KRW 15,018,040,040, totaling KRW 14,535,080, and KRW 482,920,040, which are the insurance money due to a self-physical accident, to D.
At the time of the accident, the road location of this case was at the direction of the vehicle of the plaintiff, when considering the direction of the vehicle of the plaintiff, a bend road is at the top of a perfect line of the one-lane, and there was no protective fence to prevent the fall of the vehicle, but there was no protective fence to prevent the fall of the vehicle. The attached Table 1, as stated in the "The data on the side of the place of the accident (However, the data measured by the opposite side of the vehicle of the plaintiff's driving direction)", there was a slope of 2.41m in the slope height on the right side of the road, and there was a slope of 4.02m in the slope length of the slope length, and there was a concrete drainage of 0.5m in length and a ginseng field with the length of 0.5m in the right side of the slope.
[Ground of recognition] A did not dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 9 (including each number), and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number), and the plaintiff's unilaterally taken part of Gap evidence Nos. 7, and Gap evidence Nos. 8-1 through 4.