The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged of this case is as follows: A, an employee of the defendant, loaded feed at the Kac Truck on November 19, 199 to the Kac Truck on the part of the defendant's business and measured the violation of the restriction on operation at the vehicle operation by the road management agency by loading and operating the 2.8 tons of the above vehicle on the 14:5 tons of the two dub load of the above vehicle at the vehicle moving station located in the dosan-si, Ycksan-si, the next day according to the line of national highway 1, 14:55 on November 19, 199 in order to move the Kac Truck to the Kac Truck to the Kac Truck to the Kac Truck in the city

2. As to the facts charged in the instant case, the prosecutor charged a public prosecution by applying Articles 86, 83(1)2, and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; hereinafter “former Road Act”) to the facts charged in the instant case, and the above summary order was notified and finalized.

However, after the above summary order became final and conclusive, the part of Article 86 of the former Road Act stating that "if an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation commits an offence under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under the relevant Article." In accordance with the above decision, the corresponding provision of the same Act, which is applicable mutatis mutandis to the facts charged, was retroactively invalidated.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.