A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2013, the Defendant, while repairing a computer at the “D” travel office located in the fifth floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building, taken screen pictures using a cell phone for the victim E (hereinafter “D”), who is an employee of the said office, using a cell phone for the parts of buckbucks and clothes attached to the attached crime list, and taken 7 women’s buckbucks, etc. from around that time until November 10, 2014.

As a result, the defendant taken the body of another person, who could cause sexual humiliation or shame, using a camera or other similar mechanism, against his will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A list of seizure records (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. Application of each statute of examination of evidence;

1. Article 14 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds for sentencing as follows);

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the sentencing of Articles 16(2) and 16(4) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against Social Service and Order to Attend: The frequency of the crime is relatively large and many victims; most of the crimes have taken clothes inside a female fright, and the method of crime is interviewed and the nature of the crime is pleasure of pleasure. Among them, among them, the victim’s severe mental pains due to leakage of motion pictures from E outside and without agreement with the victim is the victim, and thus the victim’s severe punishment is hump: the defendant is recognized and against the crime of this case. The defendant does not intentionally divulge the above motion pictures to the outside. The defendant does not appear to have intentionally leaked the above motion pictures to the outside. The defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the same criminal record and fine, and other Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, and environment.