1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the plaintiff A, until October 31, 2017, was a person who was in office as the head of the village of Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-do, and the plaintiff B, a farming association corporation (hereinafter "Plaintiff corporation") is a corporation that received subsidies from Gangwon-do and operates the main public hall.

On February 24, 2018, the defendant is a person who was appointed as a new head of the above Dri village through a community general meeting.

A around 2017, the Defendant filed a criminal complaint with the Plaintiff’s embezzlement while managing KRW 60,50,000,000 for the Village Development Fund. However, on December 5, 2017, the Defendant was issued a disposition of unfounded evidence (defluence of evidence).

Since then, around 2018, the Defendant filed a criminal complaint while the Plaintiff A embezzled KRW 95 million of the Village Development Fund in the course of business. However, the Defendant was issued a final disposition on December 20, 2018, as well as on December 20, 2018.

In addition, the defendant filed an application against the plaintiff A for provisional disposition on the inspection and copying of the account books, etc. with the Chuncheon District Court's Young-gu branch 2018Kahap46, and was dismissed on January 17, 2019, and the defendant filed an application for provisional disposition on March 6, 2019 against the plaintiff A for provisional disposition on the inspection and copying of the account books, etc. with the Chuncheon District Court's Young-gu branch 2019Kahap5.

As can be seen, the Defendant filed a criminal complaint and civil petition against the Plaintiff A several times and filed a complaint against the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff A filed a tort against the Defendant to compensate for damages equivalent to KRW 20 million.

On the other hand, on December 17, 2018, the Defendant sent a false text message to the residents of the above Dri village to the effect that “the Plaintiff corporation was partially suspended from its business on August 31, 2017.” On December 19, 2018, the Defendant sent a false text message to the residents of the above Dri village to the effect that “one year and four months of business suspension of the Plaintiff corporation at the Gun Office” was “one year and four months of business suspension of the Plaintiff corporation.”

Therefore, the plaintiff corporation seeks damages equivalent to 10 million won from the tort against the defendant.

2...