Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The court below rejected the illegality and acquitted the Defendants on the ground that the summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual errors and misapprehension of legal principles) simply reliance only on the Defendants’ assertion and thus, constitutes an act for the public interest. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is the head of the E church located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, who is the head of 24 teaching staff, and Defendant B is the head of the above church's right society adviser.
At the time, the victim F filed a complaint against G members of the above church G, the head of the administrative division, H H, the head of the administrative committee, the chairman of the finance committee, against G members of the above church, on the grounds that the apartment owned by the above church maintenance foundation, which is being used as a company house, was registered, transferred to G in the name of G without going through the procedures such as approval of the church church conference, there has been disputes between the defendants and the officers of the above church
A. Defendant A, at around 14:20 on November 27, 201, at the above 24 church meetings held on the first floor of the above church, Defendant A made a statement to the effect that the above complaint is unreasonable by F from among 100 participants of the above meetings, Defendant A made a statement to the effect that “F head has a relation to women’s problem, a church’s mother, and a church’s mother's mother, and there was a problem with other gatherings, and there was a problem with other gatherings. At the end of the denial decision, the head of G woodgol, who was the head of the church, was the head of the church, etc., and the head of the church, who was the one of many people, left the church, and allowed a church to leave the church, is a clean portion. It is f.o., if you will not see the thickness of the time.”
Accordingly, the Defendant damaged F’s reputation by openly pointing out facts to the effect that the Defendant was at an inappropriate female problem with F and became a church due to these problems.
B. Defendant B is the Defendant on Nov. 1, 201.