beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for divorce, etc. with Suwon District Court 2013Ddan13617. On October 17, 2013, the conciliation was concluded on the following grounds: (a) on October 17, 2013, the above court (i) “A person divorced with the Plaintiff; (b) the Plaintiff shall implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration of the real estate indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendant as property division.
B. The Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer of the instant real estate to the Defendant on December 18, 2013 following the said conciliation.
C. Since then, there was a dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant regarding the failure of the Defendant to properly rear the instant principal, and the Plaintiff stated to the effect that “I would like to see how to see that the Defendant “I would have re-born son,” and that I would transfer the instant real estate to B with the right of parental authority, right of care, and right of care, I would like to look at us in the future.”
On June 7, 2016, the defendant, "I return to the name of Doctrine, who will bring about the parental authority, the right to care," and "I send documents necessary for the registration of Doctrine because there are many problems arising from the transfer of Doctrine gift tax due to the name of Doctrine in the name of Doctrine and send the documents for the registration of Doctrine to Doctrine because I send the documents for the registration of Doctrine to Doctrine, I will know the Doctrine, and I would like to find out the Doctrine of Doctrine (the real property of this case) now have a loan of KRW 56 million at the time of the divorce, and I would like to complete payment of KRW 38 million at the time of the divorce, so I would like to reduce the amount of KRW 20 million by cash, which would bring about the text message of Doctrine to 2 million."
[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1 to 8, Eul evidence 10, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Parties.