logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.12.05 2013노1568
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant under the influence of alcohol content of 0.138% under the influence of normal driving is unfair, considering the following: (a) the defendant concealed the passenger car of the victim C, who was in the atmosphere signaled in the front bank due to occupational negligence, and neglected to drive a car while driving a car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.138%; and (b) the victim C and his passenger E, who was in the front bank, suffered injury requiring approximately three weeks of treatment; (c) the case is not somewhat weak; (d) the defendant was sentenced to a fine due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (f) and the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims; (e) the sentence (f) sentenced by the court below (f) the suspension of execution of imprisonment for six months, 80 hours of community service order, and 40 hours of order of compliance driving

2. Even when considering the circumstances alleged by the prosecutor in the judgment, considering the following: (a) the confession and reflect of the defendant; (b) the defendant did not have the same criminal records except for a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on October 15, 2007; (c) the defendant subscribed to a comprehensive automobile insurance and paid medical expenses and agreed money to the victims in the above insurance company; (d) the defendant has reached an agreement with the victims at the appellate court; (e) other circumstances, such as the character, conduct and environment of the defendant; and (e) the background and result of each of the crimes in this case; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, the prosecutor’

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow