The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact-finding, the defendant did not have a knife E with the victim E under paragraph (2) of the crime, and it was eventually the wind that E had a knife with the knife hand of the defendant's knife, but the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the crime, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The Defendant was in a state of mental disorder under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime.

C. Even if the part of Paragraph 2 of the criminal facts of an unreasonable sentencing is found guilty, the sentence imposed by the court below (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관하여 피고인 및 변호인은 원심에서 이 부분 항소이유와 동일한 주장을 하였고, 원심은 ‘피고인 및 변호인의 주장에 대한 판단’이라는 제목 아래 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 피해자 E의 일관된 진술(피고인이 피해자를 위협하면서 칼을 들이댔고, 피해자가 피하려고 하였으나 칼에 찔려 상해를 입었으며, 피고인의 손을 잡은 적이 없다)의 신빙성을 인정하여 범죄사실 제2항 부분에 대하여 피고인을 유죄로 판단하였다.

The judgment below

In addition to the reasons and records, the judgment of the court below is just and it does not seem that there is an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding facts, and it does not seem that there is any error of law that affected the judgment by misunderstanding facts.

The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. In light of the motive and background of the instant crime, the process of the instant crime, and the Defendant’s speech and behavior immediately after the instant crime, which is acknowledged by the record as to the assertion of mental disorder, the Defendant has a disability of Grade III in mental retardation, and the alcohol at the time of the instant crime.