1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From February 4, 2015, the foregoing.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 27, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant to lease the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) with the following content, and delivered the instant real estate upon receiving the lease deposit and the prepaid car from the Defendant.

Lease deposit: The lease period of KRW 54 million per annum from September 4, 2012 to September 3, 2013: From September 3, 2013

B. On February 3, 2014, the Plaintiff decided to extend the said lease agreement between the Defendant by February 3, 2015.

C. The Defendant did not pay monthly rent after February 4, 2015, and possessed and used the instant real estate.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Gap evidence No. 5-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the lease contract of this case was terminated at the expiration of the term, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff and pay 4,500,000 won per month from February 4, 2015 to the completion date of delivery of the real estate as unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.