1. On January 8, 2016, the Defendant’s measure against the Plaintiff for non-approval of medical care due to official duties (L4-5, L5-S1) on the escape card of the conical test (L4-5, L5-S1).

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 22, 2015, while serving as a public official of the 8th class in the post office of the Busan Regional Administration, the Plaintiff: “Around September 18, 2015, on the part of the Defendant, the mail to be delivered at the post office of the Defendant was laid down while being loaded on the delivery vehicle; on the part of the delivery vehicle, the mail inside the delivery vehicle arrived at a large number of gates; on the other hand, the mail was laid down in the delivery vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”); on the other hand, the Plaintiff did not receive a treatment for the large number of mails; on September 22, 2015, the Plaintiff received an application for approval on the right side of the C Hospital on September 29, 2015, and received an application for approval on the medical examination and treatment in order to ensure the delivery of the mail; on the other hand, he/she was in accordance with the medical examination and treatment trend of the No. 4-1, 54, 500.”

B. On January 8, 2016, the Defendant approved the Plaintiff’s medical treatment for official duties with respect to the salt, tension, the right shoulder section, and the net wave to the right shoulder section, and decided not to approve the medical treatment for official duties on the ground that there is no causal relationship with the public duties with respect to the “surgical signboard escape certificate (L4-5, L5-S1), and the right shoulder section (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”), on the ground that there is no causal relationship with the public duties (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. Although the Plaintiff filed a request for review against the instant disposition, the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee rendered a decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s request on March 16, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the injury or disease of this case occurred due to the accident of this case and the Plaintiff’s duty of long-term burden on the parts of the Plaintiff, and thus, the injury or disease of this case, which is caused by the Defendant’s duty of care on a different premise.