logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.05.25 2016고정348
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, as the representative director of the corporation B, is a user who ordinarily employs two workers and conducts multi-family housing management business (expenses and facility management).

When a worker retires, an employer shall pay a retirement allowance within 14 days from the date of his/her retirement.

Provided, That the date may be extended by mutual agreement between the parties in extenuating circumstances.

However, the Defendant did not pay KRW 3,122,710 of D retirement pay as security guards from November 27, 2013 to February 20, 2016 at the place of business entrusted by the Council for Representatives of Residents of Hongsung-gun Apartment-gun, Hongsung-gun, without agreement between the parties to the extension of the payment deadline, within 14 days from the date of retirement.

2. A crime of non-compliance with judgment: A judgment dismissing a public prosecution on May 25, 2017 where a worker D expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant on the grounds of the prosecution of this case under the proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow