beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. Around 08:00 on August 21, 2012, the Defendant driven a D truck under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.168% without obtaining a driving license from a vehicle driving license at a section of about 7km from the front corner of the Defendant’s house in Masung City to the road in front of the New Ganyang-dong in Masung-si.
2. According to the records, around 07:20 on August 21, 2012, the Defendant’s and the Defendant’s birth E may recognize the fact that: (a) they drive D cargo vehicles from their own residential places to the New Twit-dong located in the Trannam-dong; (b) have Jinju 2 Disease and Jinantoma 1 Disease; and (c) the Defendant again demanded the exchange of Jintoma with the New Twit-ro at around 08:0 on the same day.
In addition, the defendant stated at the investigative agency that he was drinking the Soviet and the Soviet in the park adjacent to the Namyang-si branch of the Namyang-si branch in the same day at around 07:20 of the same day, while Eul stated in this court that the Soviet and Soviet are memoryd as drinking at the Soviet parking lot, the defendant and E at the time did not have their own house after the so-called Soviet and so-called Soviet.
However, in order to comply with the above facts charged, the defendant and E have driven a cargo vehicle from their own house to New Daily at around 08:00 on the same day, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant and E have driven a cargo vehicle from their own house to their own house to their own house, and after they go to the small house after they go to the small house after they go to the small house and then the defendant has again driven a cargo vehicle from their own house to New Zealand. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant and E have gone to their own house after the small house and the small house.
In addition, according to the CCTV images submitted by an investigation agency, it is confirmed that the defendant gets out of the driver's seat of the cargo vehicle, but only the witness's statement alone is the CCTV.