logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.09.23 2015가단509028
손해배상(자)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of premise;

A. At around 18:05 on June 13, 2013, F driven a G car and tried to drive the tri-distance intersection in front of the Jeonnam Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stakak Stakak Stakak Stakak Stakakak Stakakak Stakakak, which is located in the east Stak Stak-dong, along the two-lane from the right side of the Ghak Stakak Stakak Stakak Stakak Stak-gu, and from the same point of view, H turned over the center, while driving the said intersection to the right side of the Haak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stakak Stakak-gu, which was sent to the G Kak Pakak-gu, but died by a low blood shock due to an excessive shock on the same day.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

Plaintiff

A is the wife of H (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), and the rest of the plaintiffs are the offspring of the deceased.

C. The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive insurance contract for the said automobiles.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 3-6, Eul evidence 2-2, 3, 5-19, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims

A. While the plaintiffs alleged that the plaintiffs sought compensation for damages caused by the accident of this case against the defendant, the defendant asserted that the F is not liable for damages since the damage of this case was not caused by negligence.

B. According to the statements and images set forth in No. 2 No. 16 and 17 of the evidence No. 2-17, the deceased’s driver’s error-centered and left-hand turn without making a left-hand turn to the left-hand turn, and it can be acknowledged that the situation of collision with the F driver’s car after passing the central line immediately after passing out of the intersection and passing it over to the opposite lane, and contrary to the statements set forth in No. 2-4 of the evidence No. 2-2, the F driver’s car has yet to be believed at the time of the instant accident.

arrow