logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.04.05 2017나4175
대여금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff filed an application for provisional seizure of real estate with respect to Jongno-gu Seoul Building (hereinafter “instant building”) owned by C on June 19, 2014. The Defendant, as the former owner of the instant building, paid the Plaintiff KRW 20 million with introduction of C while not being paid part of the purchase price of the instant building from C, on June 23, 2014. The Defendant, as the former owner of the instant building, paid KRW 5 million to the Plaintiff on the same day, and KRW 5 million was paid to the Plaintiff on July 30, 2014, KRW 100,000 from July 30, 2014 to November 30, 2014 to KRW 500,000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,000 won, per annum 64,000,00.

On October 25, 2017, the Plaintiff stated the cause of the claim somewhat ambiguous through a statement of the complaint at the first date for pleading of the first instance court on October 25, 2017, but on March 15, 2018, the cause of the claim at the first date for pleading of the court on March 15, 2018.

arrow