logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2014.12.11 2014누10224
정부출연금환수 및 기술혁신촉진지원사업 참여제한처분 취소
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. All plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

3. The plaintiffs' total costs of litigation.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff Company A (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff Company”) is a company established to engage in the manufacturing business of electric appliances, lamps, and lighting fixtures. The Plaintiff Company B is the representative director of the Plaintiff Company, and the Plaintiff Company C is the managing director of the Plaintiff Company.

The Technology Information Promotion Agency for Small and Medium Enterprises is an institution established pursuant to Article 20 of the Act on the Promotion of Technology Innovation of Small and Medium Enterprises to efficiently promote technological innovation and informatization management

B. On January 17, 2011, the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration publicly announced an implementation plan for the business start-up growth technology development project of small and medium enterprises (hereinafter “instant project”) pursuant to Article 201-12 of the Enforcement Decree of the Small and Medium Business Administration announced pursuant to Article 10(1) of the Act on the Promotion of Technology Innovation of Small and Medium Enterprises and Article 7 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and designated the Technology Information Society Agency as a specialized institution in charge of receiving applications for participation in the instant project, preparing business plans, and evaluating tasks. The Plaintiff submitted the instant project plan (hereinafter “instant project

C. On June 29, 201, the Defendant reviewed and assessed the business plan submitted by the applicants, selected the Plaintiff Company as a person eligible for support for the instant project. On June 29, 2011, the Plaintiff Company and the Small and Medium Enterprise Technology Development Project Convention (hereinafter “instant Convention”) entered into an agreement with the Plaintiff Company

(Plaintiffs: The name of this project: D Total period of technology development project: from June 1, 201 to May 31, 2012 (total 12 months) the total project cost for the development of technology (unit: 12 months) and the total cash contributions of the government-invested private sector (unit: 19,803,000 to May 19, 2012: the head of the relevant Plaintiff company, position research institute, and name C Convention Party A: The Plaintiff Company A, Article 3 (1) of the Plaintiff Company A, as follows: The Government-funded Project Fund (contribution) shall pay contributions:

arrow