[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, from December 2, 2015 to January 2016, 2016, had sexual intercourses by receiving KRW 60,000 won per male guest who found the place from the north-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D4 story, and by receiving KRW 60,00 per male guest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning F by the prosecution;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol and the statutes on the list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) of the Provisional Payment Order;

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is the owner of the building where the “E” (hereinafter referred to as the “E”) located in the fourth floor located in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu.

On November 27, 2014, the Defendant knew that the building owned by the Defendant was provided for commercial sex acts on the ground that F was controlled by the police officer in charge of the safety of living and order in living in the Seodaemun-gu, Seocheon Police Station located in 705, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, and that F was continuously operating commercial sex acts in this case even after F was controlled as above, the Defendant provided F with a building that was provided for commercial sex acts by leasing KRW 15 million to F’s husband G with a deposit of KRW 7 million and rent of KRW 700,000,000,000 to F’s husband G on March 19, 2015.

2. According to the Defendant’s statement, etc., the following facts are found: (a) the Defendant’s statement, etc. revealed that the F had been under control by a police officer in charge of around November 27, 2014 when operating a sexual traffic establishment at the instant establishment; and (b) the Defendant leased the instant establishment to F’s husband G around March 19, 2015, as stated in the facts charged.

However, the following circumstances recognized by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, the defendant.