The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant was aware of the crime of this case and misunderstandings, and the fact that the victim L has paid the full amount of damages and agreed to pay the full amount of damages.

However, the crime of this case is that the defendant, who had worked as an employee of the certified judicial scrivener office, acquired money from financial institutions or clients by taking advantage of his position, and in light of the criminal history and form, the crime of this case is bad, and the defendant has been sentenced to a punishment due to a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime; even though the total amount of damage exceeds KRW 140 million, the other victims except for the victim L did not take measures to compensate for the damage, such as repaying the amount, etc.; and in full view of various sentencing conditions as well as various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age and behavior environment and the circumstances before and after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the sentence against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.