The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the CCTV images and the testimony of the court below in which the date and time, and place recorded in the summary of the grounds for appeal were recorded, and the defendant was found to have insultingly insulting him on the part of his sexual organ as the injured party, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant on the ground that it is otherwise erroneous in the misapprehension of facts which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination:

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was around 01:10 on September 29, 201, the Defendant collected the alcohol residues on the side table of the victim E, on the ground that the victim E, who danced, was unbundled and passed through his front, at the string of the D clubs located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu Seoul, for the following reasons: (a) around 01:10 on September 29, 201, the Defendant openly insulting the victim as aground on the part of the victim’s sexual organ.

B. The judgment of the court below is examined as to whether the defendant had an intention to insult (each general subparagraph is added) or not, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of the court below, i.e., the defendant is not aware of E at all, i.e., at the time of the incident, e., at the time of the incident, and e.g., e., at the time of the incident, e., e., at the location of CCTV in a large number of clubs, e.g., e., over the front of the defendant (1:10:29) and after e., after 1:10:45, the defendant carried the cell phone, e.g., e., the remaining e., on the lower court’s surface (1:10:50), and e., e., e., at the time of the incident., e., e., the defendant’s act of insult or e., 10:10.