The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant's act of cutting down the victim's d's dubage constitutes legitimate self-defense as an act to defend the victim's assault. However, the judgment of the court below erred by mistake of facts.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant was found to have been aware that the defendant was forced to exercise traffic control on the date, time, and place in the judgment of the court below, and that the defendant was forced to have a traffic control, followed the victim's office, followed the victim's "doctrine", followed the victim, followed the victim, followed by bat with the victim, and carried out physical fighting with E, and that E was suspended from fighting. Thus, the defendant's argument of mistake of facts is without merit, since this act of the defendant was committed with improper assault and it cannot be viewed as an act of defending this.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.