beta
Text
1. Defendant B Co., Ltd. shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 2,00,000,000 as well as its annual interest from March 24, 2009 to September 10, 2010.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties to the instant case (1) The Plaintiff is a company aimed at the construction implementation business. The Plaintiff’s trade name was changed to the current trade name on April 29, 2010 via G, H, I, I, and J.
(2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a company aimed at operating and managing the funds of a small and medium enterprise establishment investment association, providing information related to the establishment of a business, and arranging and advising the business for the founders. Defendant D is the representative director of Defendant B, and Defendant E is the vice president of Defendant B.
(3) Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is a company aimed at the primary wholesale and export business, and Defendant F is currently the representative director of Defendant C and K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”).
(4) K is a company with the purpose of chip manufacture and sale, manufacture and sale, etc., and L companies (hereinafter “L”) possessed 14,327,720 out of the total issued shares of K as of December 2005.
B. Around September 2005, the Plaintiff and Defendant B submitted the K acquisition intent letter (1) L agreed to sell all of their shares to a third party. Around September 2005, M company (hereinafter “M”) was selected as a sales agent for the purpose of selling as a sales agent. Since that time, M followed the procedure of selling K shares through bidding (hereinafter “instant sales procedure”).
(2) Around October 2005, the Plaintiff obtained information that the instant sale procedure is in progress and decided to participate in the said procedure. Around that time, the Plaintiff entered into an advisory contract with the accounting firm N, setting the contingent fee of KRW 30 million, and KRW 270 million in the event that the Plaintiff takes over K, and paid KRW 30 million in the down payment to N around November 2005.
(3) However, compared to the competitors seeking to participate in the sale procedure of this case, the size and recognition of the Plaintiff is as follows.