1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On January 10, 2018, the Plaintiff prepared and delivered to the Plaintiff a written commitment to pay KRW 22,700,000 to the Plaintiff by March 31, 2018 (hereinafter “instant payment note”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment thereon

A. The gist of the argument is that the Plaintiff did not enter into a monetary loan agreement with the Defendant or actually borrowed money, and that the Plaintiff did not bear any monetary obligation against the Defendants, but did not take continuous desire and intimidation. The Plaintiff drafted a letter of payment in this case.

Therefore, inasmuch as there is no obligation of the Plaintiff based on the letter of claim for payment in this case, it is sought to confirm that there is no obligation against the Defendant.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion to the effect that the Plaintiff’s statement of payment in this case was made with defective expression of intent, such as the Defendant’s continuous desire and intimidation, is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, in full view of the purport of the entire argument in the statement No. 7, it is recognized that the Plaintiff actually borne the Defendant with the obligation to pay the amount indicated in the above written statement of payment, and that the Plaintiff did not recognize the Defendant’s objection in expressing his/her intent to pay the amount to the Defendant.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is not accepted.

3. The plaintiff's request for the conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit.