logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.02 2018나39579
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim extended in the trial are all dismissed.

2. Following the extension of the purport of the appeal cost.

Reasons

1. The ground for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument of the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to the court of first instance.

Therefore, this court's decision is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the first instance court's decision is the same as the following, in addition to the dismissal of part of the judgment of the first instance court.

o. The 14 and 15th 7th 15 of the judgment of the first instance court "the plaintiff seeks payment of KRW 130 million to the defendants as part of the above active damages and KRW 20 million as consolation money." The plaintiff seeks payment of KRW 178,517,230 to the defendants of the above active damages, KRW 30,000,000, and KRW 30,000,000, and KRW 30,000,000, and KRW 238,517,230, as part of the above active damages."

2. As such, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's claim extended in the trial court is without merit, and all of the claims extended in the plaintiff's appeal and the trial court are dismissed.

arrow