The punishment of the accused shall be five months of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

On April 28, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Gwangju District Court for embezzlement and terminated the enforcement of the sentence at the Gwangju District Court on October 28, 2016. On July 27, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with prison labor, two months of imprisonment with prison labor, and four months of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively.

8.4. The judgment became final and conclusive around the day.

1. On October 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from the victim B, who had called the Gwangju prison in early 2016, to be aware of the farmer who purchased the salt farm with a unique nature, from the victim B; and (b) had no intent or capacity to trace the purchase of the salt farm for the victim; (c) received money from the victim after release under the pretext of expenses necessary to perform the above activities and expenses for purchase and sale of the salt farm; and (d) received money from the victim by telephone to obtain information about the salt farm purchaser; and (e) receive money from the victim to obtain money from the victim.

D. In other words, the term “assumed” refers to the purport that it is to be paid to the farmers raising salt under the pretext of the cost of information provision to be paid to the farmers raising salt on October 28, 2016 and on the pretext of the cost of visiting the farmers suffering from the damage to the South and the strong-jin farmers, and the same month.

7. 5.3 million won, and the same month.

9. The 3.7 million won, the 3.3 million won on the 14.3 million won on the same month, and the 29.1 million won on the 29.1 million won on the 1st of the same month were remitted from the damaged person in order to obtain information, and acquired the total of 17.5 million won from the injured person.

2. On May 19, 2017, the criminal defendant against the victim C found in the victim C's stock farm located in Namyang-gun, Namyang-gun, the defendant would purchase 100,000 won per internal 70,000 won to the victim although the defendant did not have the intent or ability to purchase salt from the injured party.

Money will pay KRW 70,000,000 after the end of 100 maris.

‘Falsely speaking, it received 250,000,000 won of the market price from the injured party and acquired the 250,000 won of the salt.

Summary of Evidence

1..