beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. A. A limited liability company G was established on February 21, 2007 (the representative is H, I’s wife), and on March 12, 2007, the trade name was changed to G-based limited company of agricultural company, and on April 5, 2017, the trade name was changed to the Defendant corporation.
(hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendants.” The equity composition of Company G is H50%, J 20%, and K 30%.
B. J transferred L to J the remittance of KRW 50 million on February 9, 2007, KRW 20 million on February 28, 2007, KRW 20 million on February 28, 2007, KRW 20 million to J, M means KRW 1350,000 on March 26, 2017, KRW 650,000 on March 27, 2017, KRW 650,000 on the same day, KRW 13,000 on the same day, KRW 13,000 on the same day, KRW 50,000 on the same day, KRW 5,000 on April 6, 200, KRW 11,500 on Q means on June 11, 2007, and KRW 15,507 on June 15, 207, respectively.
(3) On February 9, 2007, the J has remitted each of the KRW 50 million and KRW 30 million to the I on February 9, 2007 (the transaction record is written as “financial loan I”. (The transaction record is written as “financial loan”).
4) The J respectively remitted to S Co., Ltd. operated by I KRW 20 million on Feb. 28, 2007, KRW 20 million on Apr. 9, 2007, KRW 20 million on Apr. 20, 2007, and KRW 20 million on Apr. 20, 2007.
C. On April 4, 2007, the Defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of sale on March 15, 2017 with respect to FY 3569 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).
(Transaction value is KRW 900 million).
J filed a complaint against T and U due to the crime of false entry into public electromagnetic records, but on April 12, 2018, the Gun Office of the former District Prosecutors' Office issued a disposition to the effect that T and U were suspected of being suspected.
E. L was killed on October 2, 2009, and Defendant B inherited L’s property.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 7 through 11, Eul evidence No. 3 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination:
A. The plaintiffs' assertion I would make an investment in the purchase fund of the land of this case to the plaintiffs through J within one year after acquiring the land of this case.