The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor and fines of KRW 100,000) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized each of the instant crimes is an element of sentencing favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has repeatedly interfered with the business of neighboring residents and that the defendant has been prior to the suspension of execution one time due to the obstruction of business is an unfavorable sentencing factor against the defendant.

In addition, the lower court did not change the sentencing conditions that may be newly considered in this court compared to the lower court, comprehensively taking into account the above factors of sentencing.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, criminal records, motive and background leading to the instant crime, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is only within the reasonable scope of discretion, and it is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.