logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.11 2013나100253
공사대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant shall be fully paid to the plaintiff KRW 6,633,189 and its amount from September 21, 2010.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is as follows, with regard to the reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance: (a) to dismiss or add part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows; and (b) to add the judgment as to the matters alleged by the defendant, it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Supplementary or additional parts】 From 1st to 4th is as follows.

In full view of the fact-finding results and the overall purport of the pleadings by the appraiser F of this Court as to the appraiser F of the appraiser F of this Court, the following facts are found: (a) the Plaintiff’s defect in the attached Table Nos. 3 and 7; (b) the stairs room of the fifth or upper floor; (c) the stairs room of the rooftop floor; (d) the interior walls of the stairs room of the rooftop floor; (e) the cost of repairing the defect in the attached Table Nos. 1 is KRW 79,430,00; and (e) the cost of repairing the defect in the attached Table Nos. 2 of the attached Table Nos. 1 of the defect warranty period of which is more than two years; and (e) the cost of repairing the defect in the attached Table Nos. 1 of the defect warranty period of which is 2 years or more; and (e) the cost of repairing the crack defects such as the wall walls of the above 5-story floor and the defect warranty period of which is 37,970.

As a result of the on-site verification conducted by this court, comprehensively taking account of the results of the fact-finding conducted by the appraiser F's appraisal of the appraiser F, the fact-finding conducted by this court on the appraiser F, and the overall purport of arguments, it is deemed that the number of windows in the sick room was generated due to the lack of waterproof construction between outer walls and windows

arrow