The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of violating the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without Permission, among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the act of receiving similar goods.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.