Two months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of No. 1 of the judgment of the defendant and the crimes of No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant. 1 through No. 19.

Punishment of the crime

On June 19, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Seoul Western District Court on September 18, 2012, and the execution of the sentence was terminated. On August 8, 2013, the Seoul Western District Court was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 11, 2013.

1. Around April 17, 2013, the Defendant against the victim C told the victim C to seek a 100 million won and an able attorney-at-law at the Seoul Southern Detention House located in Geum-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, Seoul, to seek a 865-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, to ensure that the victim C may be released upon a suspended sentence by requiring the victim C to defend the case at the same time. If it is impossible to release the victim, the Defendant would return the KRW 10 million to the victim.

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he received the above money from the victim and sent it to the children of the defendant in Canada, and there was no intention to appoint a lawyer, and there was no specific property at the time, and there was no ability to appoint a lawyer.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received the amount of KRW 10 million from the national bank account (Account Number: E) in the name of D on the same day from the victim and acquired the amount by fraud.

2. Around July 31, 2013, the Defendant against the victim F stated that, in the Seoul Southern-ro Seoul Southern-ro, Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant would give the victim F the victim F the victim F with the amount of money to be received from the U.S. corporation at KRW 22.5 billion, such as purchasing things necessary for prison life and lending necessary money.”

However, the Defendant did not have money to receive from the U.S. S. S., and even if the Defendant received necessary goods from the victim or received money from the victim because there was no particular property at the time, there was no intention or ability to pay the said money to the victim or to pay the said KRW 2.5

Nevertheless, it is not possible.