1. Each of the Defendants stated in the annexed sheet 1 “the claim amount and the cited amount” shall be the respective Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”) is a juristic person established under the Mutual Saving and Finance Act for the purpose of mutual credit fraternity business, credit installment savings business, receipt of deposits and installment savings, and lending of funds, etc., and the Financial Services Commission rendered a decision to suspend business operations on May 6, 2012, and was declared bankrupt by Seoul Central District Court 2013Hau47 on April 30, 2013, and the Plaintiff was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy on the same day.

B. The status and tenure of office as management of the Defendants A are as follows.

The lower court determined that the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the grounds that the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds that the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds that the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds that the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds that the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds that the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds that the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

From June 4, 2012 to October 10, 2012, the Plaintiff was investigating whether the Plaintiff violated the Mutual Savings Banks Act, the standard loan regulations for mutual savings banks, etc., and whether the Plaintiff was responsible for bad faith.

As a result of the above study, the loan proposal that the Plaintiff constitutes an inadequate and unfair loan, etc., the details of the loan, the amount of damages (amount due) and the relevant Defendants are listed as follows:

(hereinafter) Each of the loans listed below is indicated as “the instant loans,” and each of the individual loans is indicated as “the instant loans No. 15 times.” However, No. 15 of the loan execution amount (the unit: million won) as of the date of execution of the loan, and the purpose of the loan (effective security) and the unfair loan handling for exercising the influence of major shareholders of the Defendants, who are responsible for the contents of the loan (the purport of the claim is).

B, C, H, and J. In order to make an investment in the private equity fund for principal acquisition in the name of the borrower on April 1, 2008, 8,0008,095 A, under the name of the borrower.