1. On April 24, 2014, the Seoul Eastern District Court against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed B

1. The facts of the basis may be recognized by integrating the overall purport of the pleadings (including the fact that there is no dispute) in each entry of Gap 2, 4, 5, 7 or 10, Gap 13, 14, Eul 1, 6, and 9.

The payment order (Seoul Eastern District Court 2014 tea2776 dated April 24, 2014) as follows against the plaintiff et al. of the defendant for whom the payment order became final and conclusive, was issued, and the above payment order was served on May 1, 2014 to the plaintiff et al., and the fact that it became final and conclusive around that time is no dispute between the parties.

“The Plaintiff, etc. shall jointly and severally pay to the Defendant KRW 218,940,716 as well as KRW 9,00,000 among them, KRW 15% per annum from April 1, 2014 to the service date of payment order, and damages for delay calculated with 20% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment, and KRW 534,00,000 per annum from the next day to the day of full payment, and the Plaintiff shall pay within the limit of KRW 14,00 per annum for the Selection B.

B. Based on the above payment order, the Defendant received a seizure and collection order (which was issued on January 16, 2015, 2015, 2015, i.e., Ansan District Court, and 2015, i.e., 2015, i., January 20, 2015) from the said payment order.

Plaintiff

The Defendant, etc. agreed on the obligation from August 26, 2014 to reduce the amount of obligation to KRW 25,00,000 on May 6, 2015; however, in installments, the amount of obligation shall be reduced to KRW 13,00,000 until May 6, 2015; KRW 10,000,000 until May 13, 2015 (the date of release from attachment); and KRW 1,00,000,00 until June 15, 2015; and KRW 1,00,00,000,000 until July 15, 2015; and if the obligation is discharged, the remaining amount shall be reduced; and if the agreement is not possible, the agreement shall be null and void.

On May 7, 2015, the defendant submitted a request for the waiver of the collection order and the cancellation of the seizure and collection order against the above credit seizure and collection order.

C. On May 6, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 13,000,000 to the Defendant, and KRW 10,000,000 on May 18, 2015, and KRW 2,00,000 on October 5, 2015, respectively.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion is reduced by agreement with the defendant 25.