A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around November 30, 2015, the Defendant, at the C cafeteria located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, a member of Changwon-si, requested the victim to speak and return home from the E (V) affiliated with the police officer of the police box in the Masan-si, the Masan-si, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the victim’s behavior, such as the victim of the victim, who was called out after having been reported to frightly frightly frightly frightly frightly frightly frightly frightly frightly frightly frightly frightly frighten; (b) the victim was sexually frightly frighted by the victim of the victim, who was the victim of the victim’s frightened frightly frighted fright, who

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, took a bath to E and called together with E, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of the crime, by taking the circumstances where G, who was called together with E, attempted to arrest the Defendant as the current offender, and taking the face part of G one time at the scene of the scene set forth in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each protocol of statement to E, G, and F prepared by the police;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that his/her mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no same record as or higher than that of the suspension of execution, and that he/she does not repeat the crime that interferes with the performance of official duties again;

(3) such consideration as the