Defendant

A and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of two and a half years, and by imprisonment for a period of one and a half years.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2012, Defendant A, B, and D’s co-principal Defendants obtained permission for conversion of mountainous districts in the name of the head of Kusung-gun H and decided to extract and sell pine trees. Defendant A, B, and D, among pine trees located within the permitted area, had the intention to extract and sell pine trees outside the permitted area, to the extent that the quantity of pine trees that can be sold is not so large as to have been considered.

Accordingly, Defendant A, who is the surveying business, did not have to leave the boundary to Defendant D with the permission area, and Defendant D said that the on-site verification of public officials should be identified, and the on-site verification of public officials should be carried out.

After that, Defendant A and B moved the boundary marking to North Korea and 10 meters to the west of the permitted area respectively, and Defendant D was directed to the official from the site confirmation as if the boundary was the boundary of the permitted area.

Accordingly, Defendant A and B extracted 50 gs of pine trees equivalent to the total value of KRW 17 million in the boundary that was arbitrarily moved to an area without permission as above.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to cut standing trees without permission from the competent authorities.

2. From April 2012, Defendant B and C’s co-principal Defendants were to additionally extract 10,000 won of pine trees outside the permitted area from Defendant C, the owner of the forest, and Defendant C said to have been additionally extracted by paying 50,000 won to Defendant C.

Accordingly, Defendant B extracted 10,000 won in total of the originating prices of 4.7 million won outside the boundary that is arbitrarily moved, as described in paragraph 1, in an area without permission.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to cut standing trees without permission from the competent authorities.

3. On April 2012, Defendant A’s boundary at will, as described in paragraph (1), of an area where permission was not obtained from Gangwon-gun H, Gangwon-gun.