logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.02.07 2019고단6122
특수공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 10, 2019, at around 07:15, the Defendant: (a) received the Defendant’s 112 report that “the robbery was invaded” on the front side of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and confirmed the circumstances of the instant case from the background D belonging to the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station C District District, the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station: “C District Sheet Sheet Sheet Sheet Sheet Sheet Sheet Sheet Sheet Sheet Sheet me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face me face.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the 112 Report Processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Seizure record and list;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (limited to attachment of evidence pictures by police officers and CCTV images at the scene);

1. Relevant Article 144(1) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act is not good, the punishment is determined as ordered by taking full account of various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of crime, and consequence, etc., and the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the following: (a) the recognition of the crime appears to be contrary to the recognition of the crime; (b) there was no previous conviction and no previous conviction since 1998; and (c) the body of the victimized police officer was not directly contacted by the victim; and (d) the

arrow