Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 101,00,000 out of KRW 141,068,771 and the said money to the Plaintiff, respectively, shall be KRW 40,068,71 from January 6, 2015, and KRW 40,068,71.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the party is the autonomous management body comprised of the occupants to manage the D apartment units in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant apartment units”) 13 and 659 households (sale 459 households, lease 200 households, and the instant claim is related to the selling household), and the defendant is the project proprietor who constructed and sold the instant apartment units.
B. The Defendant, on November 13, 2009, has undergone a pre-use inspection on the instant apartment on the part of the Defendant, and the details and quantities of the Class A fire doors installed on the instant apartment (hereinafter “each of the instant doors”) are as follows: (a) the door door of the household room in the section for exclusive use 1,000 x 2,00 x 527 x 1,800 x 2,00 x 95 1,005,00 x 2,100 x 372,400 x 390 x 2,100 x 2,100 x 390 x 2,100 x 1,100 x 1,000 x 1,02 x 102,100 x 1,001.
2) Of the instant apartment 659 households (sale 459 units, lease 200 units), the sectional owners of 349 units of the instant apartment units transferred the right to claim repair against the Defendant and the right to notify the transfer of the claim in lieu thereof to the Plaintiff, respectively. The Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the transfer of the claim in five times from February 18, 2013 to July 8, 2014. 3) The ratio occupied by the total sum of the total sum of the total sum of the total sum of the 659 units of the instant apartment units to the Defendant is 52.088% (= 33,674.680§³ ± 64,649.97 square meters x 100%, and less than the third place).
C. As a result of the fireproof test and the next performance test of the fire doors, appraiser E is stipulated in Article 5(2)1 and 2 of the Standards for Automatic Firestacks and Fire Door (Public Notice of Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport) for five sections of exclusive use and six sections of common use doors (hereinafter “the sample of each of the fire doors of this case”) selected through consultation with the original and the Defendant among each of the fire doors of this case, through G Research Institute affiliated with the F Association.