The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant's act constitutes self-defense to defend the defendant's body, but the judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts, since the victim's ground of appeal spreads to escape the breath.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below acknowledged that the defendant had the intent to inflict an injury on the victim by considering the following facts: (a) when the defendant had a bomb embankment, he stated that "the victim was replaced by a bomb and a bomb money" by the defendant; (b) the defendant and the victim did so; (c) subsequently, the defendant and the victim did bomb and bomb with each other; and (d) the victim's bomb was caused by the bomb; and (c) the victim's bomb, etc. was not merely a bomb, but it is difficult to view that the defendant had the intent to inflict an injury on the victim by actively bombling the bomb, and actively bombling the bomb.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's argument is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.