The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable (one million won penalty).

2. In full view of the following circumstances, the Defendant’s assertion is rejected, on the ground that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant was unreasonable and unreasonable.

(1) In light of the legislative purpose of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, the purpose of which is to promote the sound development of automobile transport by establishing a system of guaranteeing damage compensation in the event that any person is dead, injured, or property is destroyed or damaged due to the operation of an automobile, and by preventing social loss caused by automobile accident, it is necessary to strictly punish the act of operating an automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance, like the instant crime

(2) The number of times the defendant operates a motor vehicle with no mandatory insurance policy is substantial.

③ The sentence determined by the original instance appears to have taken into account the favorable circumstances of the Defendant (the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime) and there is no change in the special circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the pronouncement of the lower judgment.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.