1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 3,817,858 and the amount of KRW 3,817,36 from December 25, 2014 to the date of full payment.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) B is the basis for the responsibility of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) around 17:45 December 26, 2012:

2) On the other hand, while driving a motor vehicle and driving a motor vehicle, the three-lane road in the middle-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, 158, the 3-lane road in front of the 158-lane road along the two-lanes along the opposite direction by the negligence going beyond the median line and driving the motor vehicle along the two-lanes along the opposite direction, thereby obstructing the driving of the motor vehicle in front of the two-lanes, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff, such as the high-speed on the left side side of the motor vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

[Judgment of the court below] The ground for recognition is without merit, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the ground for appeal

2. In addition to the separate statements below the scope of liability for damages, it shall be calculated at present in accordance with the calculation method of the attached amount of damages as shown in the separate statement of calculation of damages (the interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month shall be calculated at the simple interest rate, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but it shall be excluded that less than a month is included on the side where the amount is less than the original and less than the last month is included), and that the parties’ arguments are not separately explained.

Personal information 1) Personal information: as indicated in the “basic matters” column of the attached Table for calculating the amount of damages: (2) occupation, career, and income, and the Plaintiff, from March 15, 2010 to the “E” workplace from March 15, 2010, earned Kwikset’s income of KRW 2,50,000 per month from the date of the instant accident, and accordingly, the said income should be based on the calculation of the amount of actual income. However, in the event that the instant accident did not occur, the Plaintiff’s statement in the evidence Nos. 3 and 4 alone does not constitute the instant accident,