beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Fraud;
A. On March 2017, the Defendant: (a) around March 2017, the Defendant conducted a tax investigation if he/she collected money from the victim in the Defendant’s residence of the victim E (publically disabled class 5) who is the mother of the victim E (publically disabled class 302 Dong 915) of the Hanju-si apartment house 302 Dong 915 of the Defendant around March 2017.
Accordingly, it made a false statement to the effect that the head of the Tong would pay KRW 3.2 million in cash after one month, and that it was obtained from the injured party, by receiving KRW 3.2 million in cash from the Saemaul Treasury, which is located in the Hanju-si Undong Movement on March 2017.
B. Around September 15, 2017, the Defendant, from around 2011 to around 2011, purchased and used the franchise in the name of the victim with a premium rate for the passenger car. On September 15, 2017, the apartment house was caused by the Defendant’s failure to pay the premium for the franchise purchased in installments to the victim from the above residence to the extent that the apartment house was put out of auction.
The apartment house as security is 45 million won, which is 4,50,000 won, paid in installments at around 4,50,000 won, and the remainder of about 4,50,050,000 won shall be paid to the lending company immediately, and 4,50,000 won shall be paid within one week. The apartment house is 4,674,752 won by having the victim borrow 45,00,000 won from D. S. Loan Co., Ltd. on September 15, 2017, whichever is 4,674,752 won shall be charged by taking over 38,905,748 won in total to the account of Solomon Savings Bank, which is the account of the defendant, thereby acquiring the financial profits equivalent to 43,580,500 won.
2. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;
A. On June 16, 2017, the Defendant was holding the F’s driver’s license at the “H” mobile phone sales store located in G in G in the original city, with the intent to take out and use the mobile phone under the F’s name. The Defendant was “F”, “F”, “F”, “F”, and “F” and “F” address in the column for “B” in the application for the purchase of the mobile phone.