1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 28, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract for the pre-sale (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). On May 28, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased approximately KRW 33,057 square meters (i.e., KRW 10,000) from the Defendant on the land in Gangseo-si (i.e., KRW 10,000) (hereinafter “instant land”) and to purchase KRW 68,00,000 from July 2014. The Plaintiff concluded a sales contract for the pre-sale to purchase KRW 33,057 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). On July 10, 2014, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract for the pre-sale to purchase KRW 68,00,00 for the pre-sale goods: 30,000,000 for the remainder payment: The seller is responsible for the management of all fertilizers, agricultural chemicals, air products, etc., until shipment, and the buyer’s management of the market price should, in principle.

Provided, That the change of the shipment time due to a natural disaster shall be implemented without a separate contract after consultation with each other.

Special agreement: In principle, damage to agricultural products due to management shall be paid in full on the responsibility of the defendant.

its key

Details are as follows:

B. The Defendant’s cultivation and the Plaintiff’s tallying 1) cultivated the instant land on May 10, 2014, and thereafter cultivated it on July 2014, 2014. (2) On July 7, 2014, the Plaintiff received 11,90 square meters (i.e., 3,600 square meters) from the Defendant on the instant land from the Defendant on the first time, and on July 9, 2014, inspected the remainder of 21,157 square meters (i.e., 6,400 square meters) from the instant land on the land, and did not find any disease or disease at the time of the said tallying.

3) Around July 9, 2014, the Plaintiff received the instant unpaid benefits from the Defendant, and paid KRW 21,00,000,000, which is the unpaid amount out of the remainder of the purchase price of the instant case, on two occasions on July 11, 2014 and July 13, 2014. The Plaintiff did not have any dispute over the grounds for recognition, as indicated in subparagraphs A and 6, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion

A. On July 18, 2014, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is a considerable portion of the instant non-existent interest.