1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the lands listed in paragraph 3 of the attached list, each point of the Attached Form Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

1. Presumed factual basis

A. around 2012, the Plaintiff leased three of 11 plastic houses among 11 greenhouse houses installed on each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) to C.

B. On July 15, 2013, the Plaintiff leased the remainder of the instant land to the Defendant at KRW 9.6 million on a yearly rent, without any deposit, at KRW 9.6 million, on eight other vinyls (hereinafter “the Defendant’s vinyls”) and warehouse, etc. on the instant land.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant lease contract.” The main contents of the instant lease contract are as follows.

Location: E farm (1,760 square 11 square dong): The structure and use of E farm located in Yangju-si D: Of the facility load 2, the remainder of KRW 500,000,000,000,000 and the aggregate of KRW 9,100,000,000 (from July 15, 2013 to July 15, 2016) from among the remainder of KRW 5,000,000,000,000: the lessee shall specify that the lessor has the authority to compensate for all agricultural products during the above contract period.

The Defendant, among the leased plastic greenhouses, was able to have stoma in five daughters (hereinafter referred to as “stoma greenhouse”) and in the rest of three Dongs (hereinafter referred to as “stoma greenhouse”).

The Defendant paid only KRW 9.6 million to the Plaintiff in the year 2013, and ② paid only KRW 8 million out of the rent in the year 2014 (from July 15, 2014 to July 15, 2015).

The plaintiff urged the defendant to pay the unpaid KRW 1.6 million during the year of 2014, but the defendant did not comply with it, but said that the plaintiff will return it to its original state after completing the Saturdays farming house at the local greenhouse of the Mapotomatos by the end of August 2015.

E. The Plaintiff did not pay that the Defendant was unpaid until the end of August 2015, and did not return the leased object of the instant case. On September 1, 2015, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate of content that seeks to deliver the leased object on the premise of the payment of the unpaid rent, restoration to the original state, and termination of the contract.

[Reasons for Recognition]