1. The Defendant’s KRW 12,700,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from April 22, 2014 to March 28, 2017, and the following.

1. Indication of claims: To describe the primary cause of claims and the primary cause of claims as shown in the attached Form;

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

3. Part 12,700,000 won (i.e., KRW 5,00,000, KRW 7,700,000) for appointment of attorney-at-law in the primary claim: KRW 7,700,000; and

4. Conclusion citing the above part of the main claim and citing the remainder of the claim as to the conjunctive claim, the plaintiff did not make a decision as to the conjunctive claim (the plaintiff asserts that two claims are in the primary and conjunctive relationship, but it is difficult to view that they are incompatible claims. However, since the plaintiff's intent appears to claim consolation money as to the part of the two tort, it is judged as above).