1. The Defendant’s KRW 12,605,620 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 31, 2012 to April 15, 2015.

1. According to the purport of the Plaintiff’s evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as well as the entire pleadings, the Defendant is recognized to have inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff was taking a bath from the Plaintiff on July 31, 2012, when the Plaintiff was entering the Plaintiff’s house to which the Defendant suffered the damage, and the Plaintiff was suffering from the Plaintiff’s face on several occasions depending on his/her house, and she was walking the Plaintiff’s body due to both sides, and caused the Plaintiff to suffer an injury, such as inside and outside walls, and interior walls, which require medical treatment for 42 days.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the defendant's assault.

2. Scope of damages.

A. Existing Medical Costs: 2,605,620 won for the existing medical costs of the ordinary university hospital: KRW 931,00 for the medical costs of the ordinary university hospital; KRW 1,411,570 for the treatment costs of the Samsung Seoul Hospital; KRW 2,792,570 for the treatment costs of the transferred first-aid unit of the Central-gu one-day branch; however, there is no evidence to deem that the Plaintiff spent more than KRW 2,605,620 for the above treatment costs ( KRW 884,90 for the ordinary university hospital; KRW 1,270,720 for the Samsungnam Hospital; KRW 450,00 for the transferred treatment costs).

(Plaintiffs submitted the receipt of treatment costs under the subparagraphs of the evidence No. 4, but contain some duplicate receipts).

In the future, the plaintiff asserts that the medical expenses amounting to 4.4 million won, which is expected to be included in the scope of damages, should be included in the scope of damages, because of the fact that the medical expenses have already been showing the phenomenon of re

However, it is only acknowledged that C of appraisal at the time of the inspection around October 2014 that the Plaintiff was unable to live in daily life, and that there was a phenomenon of dubing within the central 30 degrees as it was going forward, it is necessary to provide an operational treatment and its cost is 4,400,000 won, but the possibility of such phenomenon does not exceed 10%, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that there is a possibility of future medical treatment cost solely with the above recognition.

The plaintiff's assertion on this part is without merit.

(c) Consolation money: 10 million won.