The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On June 1, 2015, at around 15:18, the Defendant: (a) sent C with a usual sense in front of Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul; (b) assaulted C on the ground that he interfered with C’s male and child-friendly sexual intercourse victim D (38 years of age) would not abide by his promise that he would not find any reason; (c) would interfere with C’s male and child-care victim’s attempt that he would not find any reason; and (d) would go into harmony, the victim’s face would be taken once more; and (d) the 2-3rd car of a bridge.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the agreement submitted on June 22, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted, it can be recognized that the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.