Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants, on June 2015, attempted to enter the F Office operated by the Victim E, Inc., Ltd., Ltd., the victim E, on the order of 13:00 in order of June 13, 2015, to enter the president’s office. However, the president’s office was corrected, and the victim’s employees G and H cannot open the president’s office.

Accordingly, Defendant A intruded the inside of the president's room out of the above office and did not correct, and opened the corrected president's room, and Defendant B intruded the president's room through open text.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly intruded on the structures managed by the damaged person.

2. Defendant B should not be able to identify the person who is the representative director in the company, although the company was involved in the work at the above date and time, G employees of the victim, and H.

Persons shall be treated without permission on the same day as those of others.

his dogpers.

We also are human beings equal to each other.

There was a disturbance between 20 minutes, such as "humping outside high school" and "huming the documents and strings on the president's room", and melting melting the melting vehicle on the floor of the office room, and placing the strings on the president's room.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the operation of the victim's office by force.

Summary of Evidence

【Criminal facts No. 1】

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The part concerning each of the police interrogation records against the Defendants during the interrogation of the suspect

1. Statement made by the prosecution against H (including the part concerning theG statement) / [Article 2 of the Criminal Act No. 2]

1. Defendant B’s legal statement to the effect that there is an entry of melting cups and cups containing melting in the place and place of holding;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with respect to H (including the G's statement part);

1. Each police statement made to H and G;

1. Determination as to Defendant B’s defense of each photograph

1. The summary of the claim is as follows: Defendant B and the victim E.