Text
The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs.
Reasons
. : A member of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-si (hereinafter referred to as the “A”): A housing association member of the C Housing Association (hereinafter referred to as the “C Housing Association member”): A (hereinafter referred to as the “C Housing Association member”): Article 1 [General Provisions] of the H (H) Construction Promotion Agency (hereinafter referred to as the “Construction Promotion Agency”) shall promote the project in a state where the approval of the project is not finalized, as a housing association member qualified under Article 32 of the Housing Act, Article 37 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and Article 17 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, as a housing association member qualified under Article 32 of the Housing Act, and Article 17 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, he/she shall delegate the relevant business affairs to Byung for the implementation of the project, and the cooperative agency expenses (referring to all consent forms, articles of association, etc.) shall be paid to Byung, and Gap shall supply one apartment household with the project area approved in full in accordance with the construction contract and the project schedule;
Article 4 (Contributions of Members) The following contributions shall be borne by members:
* Plaintiff A: B-type housing-type contributions of KRW 183,102,00,000, the cooperative agent fee of KRW 10,000,000 * Plaintiff B-type housing-type contributions of KRW 59 square meters : The difference between the amount determined by designation of a cooperative agency fee of KRW 10,000,000,000, and the amount determined by designation of a cooperative agency fee of KRW 10,000,00 may be increased or decreased due to the change, etc. in the construction project.
Provided, That no additional contribution shall be paid to members, which is not determined by the decision of the general meeting of cooperatives or the executive meetings of cooperatives.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-4 evidence, Eul 2 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. On July 2016, the Defendant asserted that the construction was suspended due to the continuous change of the construction work and the loan even after obtaining approval for the project plan, and the construction was reported on March 2, 2018, and thereafter, the construction work was not prepared due to the non-payment of the intermediate payment of the construction until now.