logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.20 2016고단6421
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 16:10 on October 16, 2016, when boarding and leaving a Dbeet apartment, which is owned by the victim C, the Defendant, the Defendant’s sales system; (b) when driving a Dbeet apartment, which is located in the number of 316,00, the number of 20,000 Won-si, the number of 316, the Defendant damaged the Defendant’s son; (c) the Defendant, who caused a serious trouble to her son, was walking the Defendant on several occasions by walking the rear door of the driver’s seat of the said vehicle due to the son, the son, and then, the said vehicle was damaged, which is owned by the victim, by destroying the front door of the said vehicle at one time.

2. On October 16, 2016, around 16:35, the Defendant assaulted C at the place specified in paragraph (1) at around 16:35 on October 16, 2016, and was divinged at the front of the Nativewon high school located in the same 336 Sinwon in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul, upon receiving C’s 112 report, the Defendant discovered the Defendant and shouldered F, who was a policeman belonging to the E District in the Native Police Station in the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, who arrived at after receiving C’s 112 report; and

Chewing sprinking the F’s breath in hand, tightly pushed the F’s f’s f’s f’s breath, f’s f’s inside, display the drinking f’s face and part of the victim G (27 3) who was a policeman belonging to the said earth, f’s face and part of the f’s f’s f’s f’s face, which was drinking, and broken one time the victim G f’s left boom that the Defendant intended to arrest a flagrant offender on suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties, etc.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and criminal investigations by F and G 112, which are police officers, and at the same time, went to the victim G about about 14 days open situation requiring medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of each police statement with respect to C, F, and G;

1. Descriptions of a medical certificate;

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to images by reducing damaged photographs and booms;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) against criminal facts.

arrow