logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2014.05.23 2013고단353
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 7,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 5, 2011, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for embezzlement at the Daejeon District Court's official branch on July 5, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 13, 201.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A and B offered to Defendant B, who became aware of in the course of carrying out petroleum business, that “the insurance proceeds are generated if the accident occurs, and he has a little amount of money collected once within the boundary.” The Defendant B consented, and the Defendants, upon intentionally paying the automobile accident, were willing to accept the accident, which is an accident caused by negligence, and receive the insurance proceeds.

Defendant

B On June 22, 2012, around 04:38, 04:38, at the alley of the Haak-dong of the Haak-dong of the Haak-dong of the Haak-dong, he intentionally received the Hsch Rexrothn part in the name of G driving by the Defendant A, driving a FDap Motor Vehicle, which is owned by the Defendant A, an employee of the E-Energy Co., Ltd.

Defendant

B At around 04:40 of the same day, at around 04:40 of the same day, called the victim Dongbu Fire & Fire Call Center, and received the insurance by reporting that “A’s Hsch ls LS 460 car was parked by negligence while driving the FDap car,” and the Defendant A issued the E-Energy certificate to the Defendant B, and submitted it to the Dongbu Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., the insured employees.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit the fire insurance in Eastern Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., which led to the misunderstanding that the damage was a legitimate insurance accident caused by Defendant B’s negligence, and received KRW 15,000,000 from the same fire insurance company as G on June 29, 2012.

2. Defendant A and Defendant C’s joint criminal conduct are as follows: “The Defendant C is expected to cause an accident by leaving the vehicle in a place where it can open, and the accident is proved.”

arrow